This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
world:non-geometric [2024/03/04 14:41] rdouc [Proof] |
world:non-geometric [2024/03/27 17:27] rdouc [Proof] |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
Moreover, | Moreover, | ||
* Using that $C$ is a small set, we can easily show that $\sup_{x \in C} P(x,\{x\})<1$ (indeed, if $C\cap A_\eta$ contains two distincts elements $x,x'$ for $\eta$ sufficiently small, then $\epsilon \nu(\{x\}^c) \leq P^m(x,\{x\}^c) \leq 1-\eta^m$ showing that $\nu(\{x\}^c) + \nu(\{x'\}^c)$ is arbitrary small which is not possible since this sum is bounded from below by $\nu(\Xset)$). | * Using that $C$ is a small set, we can easily show that $\sup_{x \in C} P(x,\{x\})<1$ (indeed, if $C\cap A_\eta$ contains two distincts elements $x,x'$ for $\eta$ sufficiently small, then $\epsilon \nu(\{x\}^c) \leq P^m(x,\{x\}^c) \leq 1-\eta^m$ showing that $\nu(\{x\}^c) + \nu(\{x'\}^c)$ is arbitrary small which is not possible since this sum is bounded from below by $\nu(\Xset)$). | ||
- | * This allows to choose $B=A_\eta$ with $\eta$ chosen sufficiently close to $1$ so that $B \cap A_\eta=\emptyset$. Then, there exists $w_0\in C$ and $k \in \nset$ such that $\PP_{w_0}(X_k \in B, \sigma_C >k)>0$ (which can be easily seen by contradiction). | + | * This allows to choose $B=A_\eta$ with $\eta$ chosen sufficiently close to $1$ so that $B \cap C=\emptyset$. Then, there exists $w_0\in C$ and $k \in \nset$ such that $\PP_{w_0}(X_k \in B, \sigma_C >k)>0$ (which can be easily seen by contradiction). |
Now, write for any $\beta>1$, | Now, write for any $\beta>1$, | ||
\begin{align*} | \begin{align*} | ||
\sup_{x\in C} \PE_x[\beta^{\sigma_C}]&\geq \PE_{w_0}[\beta^{\sigma_C}-1]+1=(\beta-1) \sum_{i=0}^{\infty} \beta^i \PP_{w_0}(\sigma_C > i ) +1\\ | \sup_{x\in C} \PE_x[\beta^{\sigma_C}]&\geq \PE_{w_0}[\beta^{\sigma_C}-1]+1=(\beta-1) \sum_{i=0}^{\infty} \beta^i \PP_{w_0}(\sigma_C > i ) +1\\ | ||
- | & \geq (\beta-1) \sum_{i=0}^{\infty} \beta^{k+j} \PP_{w_0}(X_k\in B,\sigma_C > k+j ) +1 \\ | + | & \geq (\beta-1) \sum_{j=0}^{\infty} \beta^{k+j} \PP_{w_0}(X_k\in B,\sigma_C > k+j ) +1 \\ |
- | & \geq (\beta-1) \sum_{i=0}^{\infty} \beta^{k+j} \PP_{w_0}(X_k\in B,\sigma_C > k, X_k=X_{k+1}= \ldots=X_{k+j} ) +1 \\ | + | & \geq (\beta-1) \sum_{j=0}^{\infty} \beta^{k+j} \PP_{w_0}(X_k\in B,\sigma_C > k, X_k=X_{k+1}= \ldots=X_{k+j} ) +1 \\ |
- | & \geq (\beta-1) \sum_{i=0}^{\infty} \beta^{k+j} \PP_{w_0}(X_k\in B,\sigma_C > k) \eta^{j} +1 | + | & \geq (\beta-1) \sum_{j=0}^{\infty} \beta^{k+j} \PP_{w_0}(X_k\in B,\sigma_C > k) \eta^{j} +1 |
\end{align*} | \end{align*} | ||
which is divergent for $\eta$ sufficiently close to 1. | which is divergent for $\eta$ sufficiently close to 1. | ||